Skip to main content

Is Your Big Data Big Enough?

Big Data. Everyone wants it. It sounds cool, just like big job, big promotion, and big profits. But what’s Big Data in the world of people?

For most talent management pros, big data is about piling together all the infobits from resumes, interviews, tests, assessments, biohistory, credit (where permitted by law), security clearances, etc, etc, etc. Or what your third grade teacher used to refer to, solemnly, as “your permanent record.” (That covers a lot of bandwidth.) Then you mix it all together, put on your hardhat with the flashlight in front, and go datamining. That’s supposed to help you make sense of the Big Data by finding the common threads that lead to success, however you’ve defined that.

When your data doesn’t give you strongly reliable information, most data people just go back to the source of all data (people and their digital footprints) and add some more into the pile, mix well again, and re-mine. Sometimes that works. Not always.

For the intrepid dataminer, the alternative to just giving up is to look for sources of new data to supplement your existing data. Think of that new data just like you think of vitamins or whatever you might use to supplement your meals. (Okay, you can count coffee. Or chocolate.) It doesn’t replace what’s on your plate, it just makes it more. More nutritious? More exciting? More yummy delicious? Depends on what you’re trying to accomplish.

For talent management Big Data, let’s start by thinking about what would add those very supplements to the data we already have. (We’re going to do a little translation here so we know what we’re after.)

For vitamins, let’s substitute engageability. Note, we’re not asking people how engaged they are. We want to know how they are going to engage – to what end? When we know that, we’ve got a more nutritious mix. (You can find that data in someone’s Teamability report under Role.)

If coffee is your supplement of choice, let’s think the excitement of challenge. We want to know how much excitement someone needs because an exciting job will be very stressful to someone who hates change. And worse, someone who needs lots of challenge and stimulation will be bored at a more sedate job. Where do you think this expression comes from: Idle hands are the devil’s workshop. Oh yes, those times I had a sedate job, sedate being for me a challenge to really mix things up. But I digress. (That data will be found in that same Teamability report under Coherence.)

If nothing will do for you but chocolate, you are definitely wanting more yummy delicious in your culture. But wait, there are all sorts of chocolate. High cacao, less cacao, even fancy bars with bacon in them. How do you know what to look for? (Try that same Teamability report under the Teaming Characteristics section.)

Big Data can be great. Big Data about people can be really great. But Big Data PLUS Teamability metrics will answer questions beyond what Big Data can do alone. It will overcome the unintentional biases and shortcomings of resume reading and behavioral interviewing, inform your choices about individuals and teams, and give you a whole new bunch of management methods that will help both your people as individuals and your bottom line.

When that happens, you’ll know your data is the right size for your business!

© 2018 Dr. Janice Presser. This blog is reposted from the April 16, 2018 entry on drjanicepresser.com with permission. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Teamability: The ability to be a great team player.

Everyone wants great team players. What can you do to be a better one? Try answering these questions and you’ll generate your own personalized tips: Think back over all your job experiences – both paid and volunteer work. What really made you feel good? Make a list. Can you find some similarities? There’s an excellent chance that you’ll team best when doing the same types of tasks, with similar responsibilities, in comparable work environments.  Maybe you can swap some of your favorites with a co-worker!You don’t have to be a manager to help your teammates. Does someone need a hand with something that you can offer? Go for it! You’ll have fun doing it, and they’ll be grateful that they have you on the team.There’s really no better gift than honest, caring, respectful feedback. Is there someone you trust to give you some?  If so, go ahead and ask. In fact, your first question should be for feedback on how you team!You probably have a good sense of how you make your best contributions t…

Five Leadership Lessons From My Kids

They aren’t leaders now, and they certainly weren’t then, but I learned from them anyway… 1) If people don’t want to play with you, it might be more about them than you. Oh, the tears when someone chose not to invite my offspring to a play date or party! But then they grew up. And last week one of them told me where some of those kids are now – more than twenty years later – and you wouldn’t want to be there for all the coffee at Starbucks. Leadership Lesson: It’s more important to be true to yourself than it is to be popular. 2) Sometimes being silly is more effective than being serious. Oh, how they loved Dr. Seuss! I can still recite parts of Hop on Pop, which just shows you how effective repetition is. But buried within the silly was always something really important, worth remembering and worth trying to apply in everyday life. As we learned from Horton, “A person’s a person no matter how small,” which was quite useful the day they met a very small man in a wheelchair. Leadership Lesso…

The Job Description, Disrupted

I’m so tired of reading job descriptions. And the truth is, I hardly ever read them. In fact, I read even fewer of them than I read resumes, and if you read my blog, you know I don’t read many of those. But I do read people, and what I read is that the above-average person (which you are, since you are reading this) not only dislikes writing their resume, but reading their own job description. And, as you might guess, the reason is the same. No one is generic. No one wants to be treated as if they are generic. And people who are charged with the responsibility to write job descriptions almost never want to hire, manage, or mentor a generic person. If job descriptions were almost anything else, they would have been disrupted a long time ago. And I’m not talking about generating them automatically, or putting them on a server, or changing the font on the bullet points. Here’s what I’d like to see:
A job title that really reflects the way in which this position fits into the organizati…